Probabilistic Prediction of the 2026 FIFA World Cup Using Gradient Boosting and Monte Carlo Simulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66778/CTI.v02n01.01Keywords:
Soccer, probabilistic prediction, XGBoost, Monte Carlo simulation, ELO ranking, 2026 FIFA World Cup, probability calibrationAbstract
A comprehensive end-to-end system is presented to estimate the championship probability of each of the 48 national teams participating in the 2026 FIFA World Cup under the new 12-group format. The pipeline integrates heterogeneous data sources, including international match results from 1872–2026, event data (goalscorers and penalty shootouts), Expected Goals (xG) from StatsBomb, Transfermarkt market values, and historical FIFA rankings extended with a 2026 snapshot, to construct nine features— including derived features calculated strictly as-of-date—which are used to train four multiclass models: Logistic Regression, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Platt-calibrated XGBoost. The models are trained using exponential temporal decay weighting and class rebalancing. The best-performing model, Platt-calibrated XGBoost, achieves a Log-Loss of 0.855 and a Brier score of 0.166 on a temporal test set and is coupled with a 10,000-iteration Monte Carlo engine that complies with the 2026 competition regulations (top two teams from each group + eight best third-placed teams, tiebreakers based on points–goal difference–goals scored, and penalty shootouts). Clopper–Pearson confidence intervals place a small group of historically strong national teams among the favorites. A dedicated section discusses the model’s limitations, including debutant teams with no historical record, partial xG coverage, and the absence of structural injury modeling.
Downloads
References
Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T., & Koyama, M. (2019). Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge. Discovery and Data Mining, 2623–2631. https://doi. org/10.1145/3292500.3330701
Brier, G. W. (1950). Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review, 78(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078%3C0001:VOFEIT%3E2.0.CO;2
Cashncarry. (2023). FIFA world ranking 1993–2023 [Data set]. Kaggle. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/cashncarry/fifaworldranking
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
Clopper, C. J., & Pearson, E. S. (1934). The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika, 26(4), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/ biomet/26.4.404
Deras, D. (2026a). Predictions—World Cup 2026 [Computer software]. GitHub. https://github.com/daiv05/fifa-world- cup-model
Deras, D. (2026b). Predictions—World Cup 2026 [Computer application]. Streamlit. https://fifa-world-cup-model. streamlit.app/
Dixon, M. J., & Coles, S. G. (1997). Modelling association football scores and inefficiencies in the football betting market. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 46(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00065
Elo, A. E. (1978). The rating of chessplayers, past and present. Arco Publishing.
FIFA. (2023). FIFA World Cup 2026 competition format and regulations. https://www.fifa.com/fifaplus/en/tournaments/mens/worldcup/canadamexicousa2026
Groll, A., Ley, C., Schauberger, G., & Van Eetvelde, H. (2019). A hybrid random forest to predict soccer matches in international tournaments. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 15(4), 271–287. https://doi. org/10.1515/jqas-2018-0060
Jürisoo, M. (2026a). International football results from 1872 to 2026 (results, goalscorers, shootouts, former_ names) [Data set]. GitHub. https://github.com/martj42/international_results
Jürisoo, M. (2026b). International football results from 1872 to 2017 [Data set]. Kaggle. https://www.kaggle.com/ datasets/martj42/international-football-results-from- 1872-to-2017
Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., & Liu, T.-Y. (2017). LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 3146–3154.
Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765–4774.
Maher, M. J. (1982). Modelling association football scores. Statistica Neerlandica, 36(3), 109–118. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1982.tb00782.x
Niculescu-Mizil, A., & Caruana, R. (2005). Predicting good probabilities with supervised learning. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning, 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1145/1102351.1102430
Platt, J. C. (1999). Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. In A. J. Smola, P. Bartlett, B. Schölkopf, & D. Schuurmans (Eds.), Advances in large margin classifiers (pp. 61–74). MIT Press.
StatsBomb. (2024). StatsBomb open data [Data set]. GitHub. https://github.com/statsbomb/open-data
Transfermarkt. (2026). National teams market values [Data set]. https://www.transfermarkt.com
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bladimir Díaz Campos, David Deras

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.