Subjectivity and Artificial Intelligence, their ambiguities and paradoxes: A reading from Lacanian psychoanalysis

Authors

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, enjoyment, Neuralink, superego, unconscious

Abstract

This article presents the insights into Artificial Intelligence (AI) that have emerged in philosophy and Lacanian psychoanalysis in recent years, from phenomena such as the launch of ChatGPT It argues that AI reflects fears inherent to the human psychic makeup, as explained by psychoanalysis. It exposes the paradoxes and impasses that projects such as Blue Brain and Neuralink, which represent attempts to overcome the limitations of the human mind, entail. Along the same lines, it addresses AI as an attempt to overcome these limitations, arguing that, on the contrary, AI is incapable of overcoming them, on the one hand, and, on the other, is incapable of fully emulating the functioning of the human mind. The article closely follows the discussions developed by some philosophers and representatives of Lacanian psychoanalysis based on the categories specific to that field. 

Finally, it concludes that these disciplines shed light to the extent that they lead to questioning traditional notions of what it means to think and know reality. 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Black, J. (2024). Can AI Lie? Chatbot Technologies, The subject, and the Importance of Lying. En Social Science Computer Review, Vol 0(0) 1-12

Epoch Philosophy (2023). The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence: Fear and New Humanism. [video] https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSKeWAjZ7mI&t=1s

Everitt, K. (2023). Does ChatGPT enjoy. https:// thephilosophicalsalon.com/does-chatgpt-enjoy/

Freud, S. (1984). Obras completas, volumen 18. Amorrortu editores.

Finkelde SJ, Dominik (2021). Abjection Accomplished. On Jouissance as an Ontological Factor. En CT&T. Continental Thought & Theory. A Journal of Intellectual freedom. Volume 3. Issue2, 143-166.

Hegel, W. F. G. (2017). Fenomenología del espíritu. Fondo De Cultura Económica, 1966

Johnston, A. (2008). Žižek›s Ontology: A Transcendental Materialist Theory of Subjectivity. Northwestern University Press.

Lacan, J. (1991). Seminar II: The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954-1955. W. W. Norton and Company

Lacan, J. (1956). Seminar III: The Psychoses. W. W. Norton and Company

Lacan, J. (2009). Escritos 2. Siglo XXI Editores

Martínez García, J. S. (2012). Zombis e ideología ¿por qué los muertos vivientes nos fascinan?, Le Monde diplomatique en español, Nº. 204, 2012, p. 24

Millar, I. (2021). The Psychoanalysis of Artificial Intelligence. Palgrave MacMillan.

Murphy, M. G. (2023, 19 de marzo). E-scaping Responsibility and Enjoyment Through ChatGPT: A New Unconscious?. https://www.sublationmag.com/ post/chatgpt-a-new-unconscious

Ponce, O. (2007). Iniciación al estudio filosófico: un recorrido de la filosofía primera a la epistemología. Universidad de El Salvador

Žižek, S. (1996). The indivisible remainder: An Essay on Schelling and related matters. Verso

Žižek, S. (2002). For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor. Verso.

Žižek , S. (2006). Visión de paralaje. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica

Žižek , S. (2011). El Acoso de las Fantasías. Ediciones Akal.

Žižek, S. (2019). Hegel y el Cerebro Conectado. [video] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZohPv3XEJU4

Žižek , S. (2020). Sex and the Failed Absolute. Bloomsbury

Žižek, S. (2023a, 7 de abril). The Post-Human Desert https:// www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/ai-posthuman-future-by-slavoj-zizek-2023-04

Žižek, S. (2023c). ChatGPT Says What Our Unconscious Radically Represses. https://www.sublationmag.com/ post/chatgpt-says-what-our-unconscious-radicallyrepresse

Published

2025-07-31

How to Cite

Subjectivity and Artificial Intelligence, their ambiguities and paradoxes: A reading from Lacanian psychoanalysis. (2025). Revista Humanidades, 6(2), 67-102. https://revistas.ues.edu.sv/index.php/humanidades/article/view/3531