Metacognitive strategies for improving English reading comprehension among students at the Centre for Psychopedagogy and Research in Higher Education (CEPIES-UMSA), 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66778/RM.v04n01.01Keywords:
Reading comprehension, metacognitive strategies, language productionAbstract
Introduction: Within the learning of the English language, four linguistic skills are understood: listening, reading, speaking, and writing. Skills that every student comprehensively recognizes from the beginning of their language training. However, there are situations in which students of the English language, during their training, cannot produce the language either orally or in writing. Generally, this phenomenon occurs when the reader of this L2 is forced to pass from the initial phase of "learning to read a foreign language" to the phase of "reading to learn" in a precipitous manner. Objective: In order to improve these shortcomings, this research paper proposes the implementation of the MARSI Metacognitive Strategies inventory developed by Mokhtari and Reichard. To improve the level of reading comprehension through global reading strategies, problem-solving strategies, and reading support strategies. This entire process will demonstrate the importance of reading comprehension in English since it resides in the fact that students can understand what they read, know what is asked of them, and thus act accordingly. Method: For all of the above, this article is supported by a methodology with an experimental and quantitative design of an explanatory-correlational nature, and in turn, developed through the hypothetical deductive method and analysis-synthesis with a non-probabilistic sample of 76 participants of the CEPIES English course for researchers divided into two groups (experimental and control). Conclusion: In this way, the aim is to show that the implementation of these strategies positively influences reading skills (comprensión lectora) and thus expands the production of this foreign language.
Downloads
References
Acosta, G., & Mena, E. (2014). La comprensión lectora mediada por video. *Grafías, 27*, 7–20. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/5162577.pdf
Baker, L. (1991). Metacognition, reading and science education. En C. M. Santa & D. Alvermann (Eds.), *Science learning: Processes and applications*. International Reading Association.
Brown, A., & Palincsar, A. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed self-control training. *Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2*, 1–17.
Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant's comments: What is memory development the development of? *Human Development, 14*, 272–278.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). *Metodología de la investigación* (6.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill/Interamericana Editores.
Mateos, M. (2001). *Metacognición y educación*. Aique.
McNamara, D. S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. *Discourse Processes, 38*(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3801_1
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. *Journal of Educational Psychology, 94*(2), 249–259.
Murillo, F. J. (2011). *Métodos de investigación de enfoque experimental*. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Pinzás, J. (2007). *Estrategias metacognitivas para desarrollar la comprensión lectora*. Metrocolor.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-07-08 (3)
- 2025-10-31 (2)
- 2025-10-07 (1)
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








